A lire sur: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/10things/10-of-the-biggest-it-sand-traps/3639
One way to ease the transition (if it is necessary) is to introduce these individuals to the new platform and provide the training and support they need for the crossover. If they’re adamantly opposed to the change, there might be an opportunity for them to move into a maintenance role for systems that will continue to run on the old platform. If you can’t provide that role, as a last resort you might have to encourage them to seek employment elsewhere — in a shop that continues to use the platform they want to work on. In all cases, it is best to address these platform loyalty cases immediately and upfront, before resentment (and even lack of cooperation in projects) begins to set in.
The best way to ensure great results in projects is to make projects smaller (and therefore more manageable), to encourage (and enforce) open communications, and to use collaborative project management tools that are now available in the market. It is equally important to perform post mortems of all project work — to learn what went right and what could have been done better on each project — and to take that knowledge into future projects.
Takeaway: Many
of the issues plaguing IT departments can be mitigated or sidestepped
altogether. Here are some ways to deal with several common pitfalls.
IT faces challenges on a daily basis. But most
experienced IT’ers have learned to avoid the worst sand traps so they
can prevent time and energy drains. What are today’s biggest IT sand
traps — and what best practices can you use to circumvent them?1: Uncooperative users
Uncooperative users are still out there, as they have been through the years. Most don’t cooperate out of fear of a new application — or because of a comfort level with a present application that they don’t want to give up. It is important for IT to remember that when it changes an application, it also changes a person’s daily workflow. This can be disconcerting, even for younger users. The key is to engage users in application dialogues at the very beginning. Involve them in early app design and prototyping so they already know and buy into how the app is going to work before it is ever plugged into production.2: Unhelpful users
Unhelpful users are trickier to work with because they frequently come in the guise of “helpful” individuals who cross a threshold when they become too helpful. They offer reams of tweak suggestions for apps and never want to accept an app as being complete for a given release. Enhancement creep of this nature introduces risk into IT project deadlines. The best way to deal with it is to establish firm cutoffs for app development and enhancement cycles that everyone agrees to.3: Lack of tool integration
Everyone talks about cloud, mobile computing, and the blurring of lines between computing platforms. But vendors of infrastructure software don’t necessarily make managing across a diverse environment easier. Each vendor wants you to use its own toolset for management, and it isn’t always clear which tools are subordinate to other software infrastructure management tools. Consequently, it becomes difficult to fit everything into an “uber” infrastructure solution where you really can see everything through a single pane of glass. The best thing for IT to do is to require prospective tool vendors to show what application programming interfaces (APIs) they have that work with other management software. The APIs can be tested with other software in a proof of concept (POC) before buying. Finally, avoid the use of homegrown tools that don’t readily interface with anything on the market.4: Platform loyalty
IT’s strength is its technical know-how. This know-how is accumulated over the years and becomes a career calling card for most IT professionals. Unsurprisingly, the sledding can get rough when someone who has worked on say, UNIX, for 20 or 30 years, is told to move to a Linux environment.One way to ease the transition (if it is necessary) is to introduce these individuals to the new platform and provide the training and support they need for the crossover. If they’re adamantly opposed to the change, there might be an opportunity for them to move into a maintenance role for systems that will continue to run on the old platform. If you can’t provide that role, as a last resort you might have to encourage them to seek employment elsewhere — in a shop that continues to use the platform they want to work on. In all cases, it is best to address these platform loyalty cases immediately and upfront, before resentment (and even lack of cooperation in projects) begins to set in.
5: Poor project management
Despite new project management techniques and tools, project management remains a weak area in IT. There are several reasons for it: a failure to cross-communicate across the project; the failure of project managers to “walk around” and really check out first-hand the status of work (besides just seeing the updates on a project tracking chart); and a breakdown of communications between the IT and the end user sides of the project team.The best way to ensure great results in projects is to make projects smaller (and therefore more manageable), to encourage (and enforce) open communications, and to use collaborative project management tools that are now available in the market. It is equally important to perform post mortems of all project work — to learn what went right and what could have been done better on each project — and to take that knowledge into future projects.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire