 
  |      What You Need to Know             |                        
  |    This year's leading multichannel campaign  management (MCCM) vendors provide the breadth and depth of capabilities  needed to support multichannel campaigns, while the niche vendors focus  their efforts on software-as-a-service (SaaS) delivery and Internet  Protocol (IP)-addressable areas, such as Web, mobile and social  channels. None of the vendors is solely visionary. Despite a flurry of  acquisitions, the vendors that appear in this year's and last year's  Magic Quadrants show only modest changes. Expect accelerated digital  marketing (including mobile and social) development and acquisitions in  2011.                   |   
  |                                 
  |      Magic Quadrant             |                        
  |     Figure 1. Magic Quadrant for CRM Multichannel Campaign Management          Source: Gartner (May 2011)                  Overall, the MCCM market showed positive  growth in 2011. Marketers continued to shift investments from  mass-marketed, one-channel, one-way, company-driven campaigns to  multichannel, measurable, interaction-driven campaigns. In addition,  most of the vendors in this Magic Quadrant showed double-digit growth in  2010 and were profitable.   During the past year, MCCM providers  focused on ease of use and user interface (UI) updates, and kept overall  product development modest in scope. Although the market absolutely  needs innovative product development to grow, none of the vendors took a  differentiated direction or provided new, game-changing,  thought-leading functionality that would elevate it to visionary status.  For example, although social marketing and mobile marketing are very  hot topics for clients, many MCCM vendors continued to offer  first-generation, fundamental digital capabilities, such as the ability  to send a campaign with a short URL to Twitter.   In 2011, marketers will need to enhance  their customer databases with information that is much deeper than the  demographic and history profile data typically gleaned from social  networks. Marketers will also need to track psychographic behavior  (attributes relating to personality, values, attitudes, interests and  lifestyles) to prepare for the next wave of innovation in campaign  management. By gathering a more holistic view of their customers'  behaviors, marketers may be able to reduce the perception that their  messages are "interrupting" their customers. Instead, savvy marketers  would be able to reach prospects in a much more relevant, contextual way  — at the precise moment when the customer is evaluating and making  decisions about purchasing a product or solution.   Ideally, vendors will help marketers  achieve this vision, but these vendors must first be skilled in managing  data and applications — something the MCCM vendors will likely acquire  only through acquisition. In this scenario, marketers should expect more  acquisitions of this type as vendors seek to broaden their offerings  and position themselves for more senior-level buyers, particularly chief  marketing officers (CMOs).   We have already seen this trend gain traction via recent MCCM acquisitions, including:    IBM bought Unica to provide larger-themed Smarter Commerce solutions. Teradata acquired Aprimo for marketing resource management (MRM) and business-application-focused solutions around MCCM. Oracle bought ATG to incorporate digital marketing capability into its offerings. Pitney Bowes purchased Portrait Software for its campaign  management, and to offer management capabilities for its installed  customer base and new markets. 
   In addition, smartFOCUS will likely be purchased by Emailvision to incorporate smartFOCUS' fast analytical engine for e-mail.   The themes for these acquisitions are  somewhat varied, but they all point toward a stronger demand for overall  digital marketing capability. Indeed, each vendor is planning to  introduce or has introduced mobile marketing and social marketing  capabilities. Expect vendors to accelerate acquisitions in 2011,  particularly when the acquisition will bring social marketing expertise  to their offerings.   In addition, competitors from other markets  are starting to step into the marketing arena. By 2014, customer  service, Web analytics, content management and social CRM vendors will  take more than 40% of the market share for campaign management.                   Market Definition/Description   MCCM processes enable companies to define,  orchestrate and communicate offers to customer segments across a  multichannel environment, such as direct mail, call centers, websites,  e-mail and communities. This can include integrating marketing  offers/leads with sales for execution. Basic campaign management  includes functionality for segmentation, campaign execution and campaign  workflow. Advanced analytic functionality includes predictive analytics  and campaign optimization. Advanced execution functionality includes  loyalty management, content management, event triggering, and real-time  decisioning/offer management in inbound and outbound environments.  Digital marketing, which continues to be integrated with campaign  management, includes addressable branding/advertising, contextual  marketing and transactional marketing. Digital marketing extends the  marketing process through channels such as the Web, e-mail, video,  mobile applications and social applications, point-of-sale terminals,  interactive television, digital signage, and kiosks.                   Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria   For inclusion in this Magic Quadrant, we  focused on vendors that offer the most-relevant and compelling  solutions, and evaluated them against the following criteria. As the  market evolves, these criteria may be adjusted to reflect changing user  requirements and vendor capabilities.    Vendors must support all the following:    The ability to create, execute and manage multichannel campaigns Proven campaign planning, tracking and reporting with role and approval capability A UI suitable for marketing users who create, execute and report on campaigns Specific, basic campaign management functionality, such as segmentation, campaign execution and campaign workflow 
   Vendors must support at least two of four functionality components:     We also considered evolving campaign  management digital marketing functionality, such as Web analytics and  community and search marketing.   Market Presence and Momentum   For inclusion in this Magic Quadrant, we focused on vendors with:    At least 20 customers using campaign management At least 15 new customer wins during the past 12 months Substantial appearances on Gartner client shortlists for campaign management evaluations At least eight accessible client references 
    Vendors also need to have enough cash to fund a year of operations at the current rate of cash depletion.                   No vendors were added to this Magic Quadrant.                   ATG, Aprimo, Unica and Portrait Software were purchased, and are now evaluated as part of their acquiring entities.                     The criteria and weightings for Ability to  Execute remained the same as for 2010. We have adjusted the minimum and  maximum percentages on the Magic Quadrant to accommodate more vendors  over time, and this does not represent a change in the market as a  whole.    Product/Service: A key differentiator for vendor selection  for companies trying to gain a competitive advantage. Therefore,  product capabilities are given a high overall weighting for the MCCM  Magic Quadrant. Subcriteria include basic campaign and advanced campaign  management functionality (45%), and basic and advanced analytics (45%),  while functionality for digital marketing is given the remaining  weighting (10%). Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy, Organization):  The overall health of the vendor, including the line of business  offering campaign management solutions. Viability includes the vendor's  history and its commitment to the continued success and development of  world-class MCCM. This is given a high weighting. Sales Execution/Pricing: An assessment of the overall  effectiveness of the sales channel, and how it deals with presales  responsiveness, contract negotiations and pricing for campaign  management. This is given a standard weighting. Market Responsiveness and Track Record: An assessment of  the campaign management vendor's success in creating and meeting  consistent demand for its product, measured in continuing client wins  and use in its installed base. This is given a low rating. Marketing Execution: An assessment of the vendor's overall  momentum and perceived campaign management focus and presence in the  market. Vendors must show established and continued broad or specific  (such as industry focus) credibility for campaign management in a  multichannel environment. This is given a high weighting. Customer Experience: An evaluation of client relationships  with campaign management vendors. Product support and responsiveness  and access to best practices, such as user groups, are considered. An  important component of the customer experience is ease of use for the  tool. Gartner's campaign management clients see this as an important  aspect of the overall customer experience. This is given a standard  weighting. Operations: The ability of a vendor to meet goals and  commitments. Factors include organizational structure (including skills,  experience, systems and other vehicles) that enable the vendor to  operate efficiently and effectively on an ongoing basis. This is given a  low rating (see Table 1). 
            Table 1.  Ability to Execute Evaluation Criteria
                                                                                    Product/Service  |             high  |                                Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy, Organization)  |             high  |                                Sales Execution/Pricing  |             standard  |                                Market Responsiveness and Track Record  |             low  |                                Marketing Execution  |             high  |                                Customer Experience  |             standard  |                                Operations  |             low  |                        Source: Gartner (May 2011)                      The criteria for completeness of vision remained the same as for 2010. The Innovation weighting has moved from low to standard.    Market Understanding: A vendor's ability to understand the  campaign management space, its value proposition in the market and how  effective it is at reaching the marketing buying center for companies  purchasing campaign management solutions. Vendors will demonstrate  campaign management solutions that fit the needs of the overall market.  This is given a high weighting. Marketing Strategy: An assessment of how well a vendor can  differentiate itself from its competition and functionality, and how it  articulates continued visionary leadership in its overall campaign  management vision. This is given a standard weighting. Sales Strategy: An assessment of a vendor's strategy using  direct and indirect sales channels to sell campaign management  solutions. This is given a standard weighting. Offering (Product) Strategy: An assessment of the campaign  management feature set as it maps to functionality requirements in  campaign management, particularly functionality that enables advanced  capability in inbound and outbound environments. This is given a high  weighting. Business Model: An assessment of the vendor's alignment of  go-to-market and sales strategies for particular industries,  geographies or delivery models. This is given a standard weighting. Vertical/Industry Strategy: A vendor is assessed on how  well its solutions target its current market, as well as its ability to  leverage best practices or capabilities for targeting new industries.  This is given a standard weighting. Innovation: An assessment of the vendor's expertise or  capital for investment for pre-emptive purposes in developing new areas  of campaign management. This is given a standard weighting. Geographic Strategy: See the Business Model criterion. This is given a standard rating (see Table 2). 
            Table 2.  Completeness of Vision Evaluation Criteria
                                                                                    Market Understanding  |             high  |                                Marketing Strategy  |             standard  |                                Sales Strategy  |             standard  |                                Offering (Product) Strategy  |             high  |                                Business Model  |             standard  |                                Vertical/Industry Strategy  |             standard  |                                Innovation  |             standard  |                                Geographic Strategy  |             standard  |                        Source: Gartner (May 2011)                      Leaders consistently do considerably better  in overall campaign management performance for basic and advanced  campaigns, as well as for integration with e-marketing. Leaders have  high market visibility, high market penetration, strong market momentum  and a strategic vision for growing the campaign management business.                   Challengers see continued investments in  campaign management solutions as complementary offerings to business  applications that are their core competencies. Challengers have a  developing understanding of the campaign management market and basic  campaign management functionality. They see campaign management as an  opportunity to increase revenue and retention in their installed bases,  and they concentrate on established clients' needs for campaign  management functionality and strategic direction, rather than on setting  a visionary pace with potential requirements.                   Visionaries provide a strong vision for the  campaign management market, or excel in advanced or emerging areas,  such as inbound marketing and digital marketing. They can set strategic  direction or demonstrate specific innovative capabilities in one or more  functionality areas (such as advanced campaign functionality or  e-marketing integration) in campaign management that the market will  eventually adopt. Visionaries may have campaign management  implementations from different buying centers, such as the call center  or e-commerce department. Although Visionaries show promise in campaign  management, they may lack execution capabilities, such as growth  potential, resources or scalability, in the near term.                   Niche Players provide specific needs in the  campaign management space. They may be focused on a specific  functionality, process (for example, lead management), geography and/or  industry. Niche campaign management vendors tend to lack a broader set  of campaign management capabilities (such as advanced analytics) or  execution potential (such as sufficient resources or a fully developed  market strategy).                   Vendor Strengths and Cautions     Alterian, a U.K.-based company, is a Niche  Player in the MCCM Magic Quadrant, providing campaign management  execution built on top of a high-performing analytics engine. Clients  looking for hosted campaign management with strong analytical tools  should consider Alterian for midmarket campaign management. Consider  alternatives when a lower-cost, more operationally focused MCCM solution  offered as part of a marketing service provider (MSP) solution isn't  the priority.                    Revenue increased by 13% to £16.3 million from £14.4 million for  1H10. Alterian reported strong U.S. growth at 52%, the Asia/Pacific  region up by 13% and U.K. revenue down by 18%. Notable additions in 2010 include updates to Campaign Manager and  Selection Planner, SM2 (social media monitoring), and Content Manager —  all with UI improvements. Alterian acquired Intrepid for social media  consulting services for marketing. At the end of March 2011, the vendor released the capability to  access Alterian from any Web browser, connections to external data  sources (initially to Microsoft SQL Server), and in-line predictive  analytics and templates to provide the reuse of content. Alterian's road  map for 2011 includes predictive modeling, including integration with  KXEN and native integration with Dynamic Messenger (its e-mail marketing  offering). Alterian's developing Alchemy offering should offer much  improved ease of use and workflow for campaigns, while focusing on its  strengths in analytical reporting and including more-accessible,  role-based functionality for different users. References pointed to the vendor as being a good value for the cost. 
                    The vendor has flat profitability — operating costs increased by  17% in 1H10 (reflecting increasing costs from sales and marketing  managed service offerings, as well as SaaS delivery infrastructure). Some of Alterian's products remain on separate architectures and are run from separate servers. The channel partner, not the marketing department, usually  selects Alterian. In addition, MSPs tend to view Alterian as a  lower-cost, operationally focused alternative to larger campaign  management offerings. 
                   Eloqua is a growing, niche provider, with  top mind share in lead management and a respected on-demand solution for  B2B, or for B2B in consumer markets where "large, considered" purchases  require a sales agent. Midmarket, B2B-oriented clients, and those with  sales agents working on large, considered purchases, looking for  on-demand campaign management specifically focused on lead management  should consider Eloqua.                    Eloqua revenue grew by 30% in 2010, compared with 25% in 2009, to  approximately $51 million. The company has stated that it is  cash-flow-positive. New products for 2010 included, most notably, Eloqua10, featuring  a brand new (and needed) graphical UI that brings much improved  visualization usability to areas such as campaign dialogue creation  (campaign workflow), e-mail, form editing and reporting. In addition,  the vendor released Eloqua Insight, a revenue analytics and reporting  application. It also released Eloqua Discover for Salesforce.com, to  help sales identify, prioritize, track and convert the most active and  interested prospects and accounts. On the road map for 2011 is the release of Eloqua Revenue Suite, a  suite of applications and analytics to optimize revenue cycle  performance, and Eloqua Cloud Connectors, which enable customers to  integrate Eloqua offerings with applications such as Radian6, Jive,  Demandbase and others. References consistently mentioned professional services and support as a strength for Eloqua. 
                    Eloqua is perceived as costly, compared with the competition,  even with its tier-type offerings. Some references mentioned that the  vendor's pricing model needs to be more intuitive. Most Eloqua customers use salesforce.com. However, Eloqua should  not become overly reliant on this partnership, because salesforce.com  could decide to purchase or develop its own lead management offerings. Consider alternatives when lead management is not a priority. 
                   IBM-Unica's core competency and prevalent  mind share in the MCCM market keep it in a leadership position. Unica is  a key part of IBM's broader plans for its Smarter Commerce initiative  (involving Unica, Coremetrics, Sterling Commerce and other  assets/companies). Marketing departments should consider the vendor when  MCCM is a significant strategic requirement. Clients focused on B2B  capabilities (specifically for small or midsize businesses) should  consider alternatives.                    Overall revenue for Unica increased 11% in the first three  quarters of 2010. It did not report full-year earnings due to the IBM  acquisition, but Unica reports that 4Q10 was "the biggest revenue growth  in its history." This was an improvement from a 17% revenue drop in  fiscal 2009. Unica's product releases in 2010 included Unica 8.1 and 8.2,  which included, most notably, website personalization for anonymous  visitors, location-based targeting and landing page capability. The vendor's road map for 2011 includes rationalizing and  combining NetInsight (Unica's Web analytics offering) with IBM's  Coremetics (IBM's other Web analytics acquisition). Unica has announced  plans to release a next-generation Web analytics platform in 3Q11. The  vendor plans a broader offering of Unica Interactive Marketing OnDemand  and Coremetrics Continuous Optimization Platform as a next-generation  on-demand suite in early 2012. The vendor's references consistently pointed to high scores for advanced campaign management. 
                    The vendor must continue to provide a leading vision as an MCCM  vendor, as it has recently with its push toward interactive marketing.  Unica has the opportunity to fully leverage IBM, such as Coremetics and WebSphere for e-commerce and digital marketing. References mentioned some support issues and some lack of attention since the IBM acquisition. IBM-Unica will see increased pressure from the on-demand,  midmarket players in campaign management. Although it targets midmarket  solutions, the vendor will need to demonstrate success with its  on-demand interactive marketing solution as a whole, not distinct Web  analytics offerings. 
                   Marketo is a very visible niche provider  offering lead management capabilities primarily for the midmarket;  however, it has also made gains with larger organizations. B2B marketers  should consider Marketo as a midmarket provider of SaaS lead management  tools that enable them to automate the leads process. Consider  alternatives if B2B lead management isn't a priority.                    Marketo is small, but it continues to grow quickly. The vendor  reported more than 300% revenue growth in 2010, doubled its customer  base and reports that it is adding about 60 new customers per month.  Gartner estimates Marketo's 2010 revenue to be approximately $15  million. In 2010, the company planned updates to Marketo Revenue Cycle,  which visualizes the lead management process, showing funnel stages of  leads and tracking compliance and service level at each stage. Also  notable in 2010, Marketo Revenue Cycle Analytics began providing  Google-analytics-like dashboards to track lead movement and conversion  rates. This product also includes a UI for defining custom reports and  dashboards. Plans for 2011 include in-person event management capabilities,  social marketing capability, enhanced reporting, and new dashboards  focusing on revenue attribution, comparison analyzers, program  effectiveness, etc. References consistently point to setup and ease of use as  strengths for Marketo, and continue to score Marketo as above average  for the lead management product as a whole. 
                    The vast majority of Marketo's offerings integrate with  salesforce.com. However, Marketo should not become overly reliant on  this partnership, because salesforce.com could decide to purchase or  develop its own lead management offerings. References noted that, although the product is easy to use, in  some ways, the vendor is still learning what the industry best practices  are for global implementations. Marketo is well-funded and growing quickly, but it is not yet  profitable. The vendor has set its sights on 2012 as a break-even point. 
                   Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a niche MCCM  provider for companies targeting all verticals. Marketers can consider  Microsoft as part of a CRM suite (sales, customer service and marketing)  that leverages the familiar native Outlook/Office experience for  campaign management. Consider this vendor when midmarket B2B campaign  management is a priority.                    Microsoft is a large, profitable software company that has the  resources to invest in campaign management. Its ability to execute is  high. Microsoft offers basic and advanced campaign management  capabilities as part of its overall CRM product. The vendor utilizes standard Microsoft technologies, such as  Microsoft .NET, Internet Information Services (IIS) and Microsoft SQL  Server, and has full support for Web services. Microsoft Dynamics CRM  offers its deployment options based on the same platform, architecture  and code base. Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online, the vendor's SaaS  offering, is now in 40 markets and in 41 languages. New for 2010 were, most notably, new dashboarding capabilities  showing revenue by campaigns, lead by source, etc.; new in-line visual  analytics, such as real-time charting of data as campaigns are selected;  and conditional formatting rules to show the priority of leads. References mentioned training, ease of deployment and low maintenance as strong suits for Microsoft Dynamics CRM. 
                    References mentioned that the click-and-type data entry of  certain information is time-consuming, and that customization changes  (although easy) need automated deployment. There is no leading vision for MCCM. There is no functionality in  the product, or on Microsoft's road map, that the competition will be  pressed to duplicate to keep up with. Consider alternatives when a CRM suite inclusive of marketing, sales and customer service is not warranted. 
                   Neolane is a small, but growing, Niche  Player, with $30 million in revenue in 2010. It continues to raise  visibility and mind share in business-to-consumer (B2C) and B2B MCCM.  Marketers should consider Neolane if e-mail, Web and mobile marketing  are major channels for their campaigns.                    Neolane reported growth of approximately 40% in 2010. It has focused on the U.S., U.K., France and the Nordic market. In 2010, Neolane almost doubled the size of its development team, and added partners, such as Acxiom, KBM  Group and Targetbase, to deliver its solution and added support for its  lead management capabilities by simultaneously supporting CRM systems,  such as salesforce.com, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Oracle On Demand. New for 2011 is Neolane Social Marketing, with features including  social sign-on, social user profile capture into the marketing  database, and the ability to deliver personalized offers to Facebook and  Twitter. Neolane also announced an updated Adobe Genesis connector,  iPhone/iPad rendering and updates to Neolane Microsites. References consistently mention Neolane's easy UI and the ability to fully customize campaigns as top strengths. 
                    Several references mentioned the need for Neolane to continue to "recruit and upskill" appropriate resources to keep up with new customer growth. Neolane should leverage its capability and vision in areas of  digital marketing such as Web campaign management, social marketing and  search marketing, and should further develop marketing itself in the  social space to differentiate itself in the growing and competitive  campaign management space. Neolane offers B2C and B2B capabilities. The vendor should  further develop its lead management thought leadership by leveraging not  only B2C capabilities for B2B, but also specific B2B capabilities, such  as event management, contract management and pricing optimization. 
                   The overall viability, clear marketing  positioning and functionality of Oracle (Siebel) keeps it in the Leaders  quadrant. B2B and B2C marketers should add Siebel Marketing to their  campaign management shortlists, particularly when marketers can leverage  the integration of marketing and sales or loyalty program management.  Consider alternatives when an overall CRM suite is not the main value  proposition.                    Oracle reports that Siebel Marketing's licensed revenue and deal  size continued to grow in 2010, with a Gartner-estimated 27% growth in  marketing license revenue year over year for 1H11. In 2010, Oracle added Siebel Campaign Management and analytics  solutions on Oracle Exadata Database Machines for performance  improvements to data warehousing and query processing for segmentation  and data mining scoring. The road map for 2011 includes the integration of recently  acquired ATG and plans to start leveraging Siebel Marketing and  Real-Time Decisions (RTD) integration for offer management/decision  capability with integrated Web content. References consistently reported flexible and robust segmentation capability as the top strength for Siebel Marketing. 
                    Many references referred to the offerings being best-reserved for  "power users," and that special attention should be given to training  and user adoption. Siebel Marketing is achieving B2B and B2C momentum among  marketing departments for campaign management capabilities, but  integration with the broader CRM suite continues to be the primary value  proposition. Most references reported choosing Oracle (Siebel) because of an  existing relationship with the company, rather than because it is best  of breed, except when loyalty management was the main driver. 
                   Portrait Software, now owned by Pitney  Bowes, is a niche vendor offering advanced analytics, basic and advanced  outbound campaign management, and inbound campaign management  (inbound/outbound fusion) to B2C financial services, telecommunications  and some retail clients. Marketers should consider Pitney Bowes when  they need to add inbound, interaction-based marketing in a call center  and to other channels.                    Portrait Software reported an increase of 40% in 2010 from 2009  in MCCM-specific revenue. Gartner estimates that Portrait Software  earned about $10 million in revenue in campaign management in 2010.  Pitney Bowes' revenue was $5.4 billion in 2010. Portrait Software is more visionary than other vendors in MCCM,  due to its uplift optimizer capability, which focuses offers based on  customers likely to respond to your message, and identifies those that  will buy anyway or that will never buy. In 2010, Portrait Software was  purchased by Pitney Bowes, which should provide a much bigger market  footprint, as well as additional resources (such as sales and  engineering). The vendor has started to incorporate Pitney Bowes'  location intelligence (GIS) data into Portrait Software's predictive  modeling capabilities. The road map for Pitney Bowes in 2011 includes major version  releases of the vendor's customer analytics and inbound interaction  management solutions, including a Silverlight-based interface that  provides a consistent user experience. Pitney Bowes expects to leverage  its extended customer base, and to deliver integrated solutions for  customer acquisition, onboarding, transpromo communications and a new  digital mailbox service called Volley. Several references mention flexibility in data sources as a big strength for Pitney Bowes. 
                    The vendor's visibility and mind share for overall MCCM remains low. References mentioned that ease of use for marketing end users can  be improved, and several references said Pitney Bowes' pricing model is  difficult to decipher. Seek alternatives when a call center is not a part of your MCCM strategy. 
                   Responsys continues its transition from  being a purely e-mail marketing execution provider toward becoming an  MCCM provider. B2C marketers can consider Responsys when seeking an  on-demand-only campaign management tool that uses e-mail, social and the  Web as its main channels. Clients seeking B2B functionality, such as  lead management or event planning, or B2C clients seeking inbound  marketing in the call center, should consider alternative providers.                    The company is profitable, with 42% growth in 2010. Responsys  completed its initial public offering in April 2011, and is now a public  company. Responsys provides basic B2C campaign management, and some  advanced analytic and digital marketing capabilities, in a multitenant,  on-demand environment. The vendor targets industries including (in order  of priority) retail, financial services, travel and hospitality, and  high technology. Channels include e-mail, mobile, external social  campaign tracking and execution capability. Last year's additions to the Responsys offering included, most  notably, functionality for social and mobile campaigns, prebuilt  integrations with data warehouse systems, and display retargeting  capabilities. The Responsys road map for 2011 includes expanding multichannel  campaign scenario planning capability with testing for interactions such  as timing, channel and frequency, as well as testing for different  types of content. More social features will include multichannel  promotions that are inclusive of Facebook and Twitter, with targeted  personalized messages to fans and followers. References consistently pointed to Responsys as having met or exceeded expectations for the offering as a whole. 
                    Gartner estimates that more than 70% of Responsys' revenue comes  from e-mail marketing. Many references still reported that they use  e-mail and Web landing pages as their main channels. A few references mention somewhat slow support turnaround times  and the need to improve its communication with customers as Responsys  continues to grow. Responsys must continue to show more multichannel use as it makes  the transition from a pure-play e-mail marketing to MCCM. Most  references that chose Responsys had only evaluated pure e-mail marketing  providers for their shortlists. 
                   RightNow sells its campaign management  offerings as part of a CRM suite. It is a growing Niche Player in this  Magic Quadrant. Marketers should consider RightNow Marketing when they  need to complement customer service knowledge and activities with basic  campaign management capabilities in an on-demand delivery model.                    RightNow grew its revenue by 22% in 2010, up from 9% in 2009, and  has $185.5 million in total revenue. The vendor is profitable. It  provides on-demand CRM capability, with core strengths in customer  service and complementary marketing and sales solutions, with an  emphasis on high technology, retail, consumer goods, higher education,  government and telecom. RightNow focuses on B2C-oriented businesses,  which are better-suited to the vendor's campaign management offerings  and its installed base of service-based call centers. In 2010, RightNow added a "contact engage" score that measures  how engaged contacts are in a particular process, and administration  tools to create new data objects, tables and attributes, and map to the  RightNow database. Social additions included extending use of its  acquisition of HiveLive and its social monitoring tool, including  Facebook integration (RightNow CX for Facebook), Cloud Monitor for  Facebook, Myspace, RSS and communities, as well as community topic  monitoring. RightNow's acquisition of Q-go will bring virtual  assistance, and natural language processing and semantic processing  capabilities, to understand and guide customers' interactions. The road map for 2011 includes management capabilities, such as  the addition social data to analytic offerings, and adding marketing  content to service e-mails. References consistently list ease of use and integration as strengths for RightNow. 
                    References rated social marketing and Web analytics capability below RightNow's other capabilities. The vendor should continue to develop its digital marketing  strategy (such as social and mobile marketing), and its intersection  with customer service. Consider alternatives when integrated marketing and service solutions are not a priority. 
                   smartFOCUS is a U.K.-based campaign  management vendor in the Niche Players quadrant that offers basic and  advanced campaign management. Clients can consider smartFOCUS  specifically when seeking campaign management for offline and online  marketing capability in the midmarket.                    During 2010, smartFOCUS grew its revenue by around 17%, and  earnings were up 78%, making inroads into its targeted verticals in  retail, gaming and new media. In April 2011, Emailvision, an e-mail  provider, announced its intention to purchase smartFOCUS for £25.3  million. The vendor offers basic and advanced campaign management tools  for descriptive and predictive analysis, reporting, database  integration, and campaign planning and management. Its platform supports  outbound and inbound execution, with digital marketing channels that  include e-mail, SMS, RSS and landing pages/microsites. The vendor rounds  out functionality with partners; it partners with KXEN for predictive  modeling algorithms, and with Omniture for Web analytics. New for 2010 were Target Builder, which makes for easier  selection of new targets; calendar views showing multiple campaign  projects; a Web front-end SaaS deployment of the vendor's offerings; and  performance improvements. The road map for 2011 will likely include the integration of  smartFOCUS with Emailvision. Emailvision will likely concentrate on  smartFOCUS' capabilities in dynamic query and selection analytics  capabilities, as well as concentrating more on a full SaaS platform for  e-mail and digital marketing channels than offline channels. 
                    The purchase of smartFOCUS by Emailvision will most likely be  completed. Current customers and prospects will need a road map for what  the combined go-to-market strategy will be in terms of channel,  industry and functionality focuses. An integrated smartFOCUS-Emailvision  platform is targeted for 4Q11, and the vendor plans to continue to  support the full product range. References mentioned that, although there is high performance in  regard to the provider's solution architecture, some improvements are  needed in administration and workflow. The vendor has continued to push back its plans for a unified UI.  However, in February 2011, smartFOCUS released a beta for an integrated  analysis and campaigning tool with a unified Web UI under Microsoft  Silverlight. 
                   SAP's company strength and delivery of  marketing as an integrated solution within a CRM suite keep it a strong  Challenger in the campaign management market. Marketing departments in  an SAP environment should evaluate SAP campaign management to see  whether it meets their requirements before seeking best-of-breed  solutions elsewhere.                    SAP provides basic campaign management execution, trade promotion  management, lead management and loyalty management. The vendor reports  that about 50% of its active CRM 7.0 customers use SAP Marketing. SAP Marketing's release in 2010 included real-time offer  management in campaigns and object segmentation. On the loyalty side,  loyalty analytics, partner participation B2B loyalty and  point-of-service (POS) integration. SAP is one of only two MCCM vendors  with loyalty accrual and self-service redemption capabilities. The road map for 2011 includes high-volume, in-memory,  computing-based architecture for customer segmentation capability. Using  SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Accelerator, SAP will have more  eloquent drag-and-drop campaign creation capability for visual splits  and waterfalls. The vendor will have on-the-fly creation of in-line  graphs that guide and bring decision data into campaign creation. References mentioned that using one system that provides a single customer view with SAP as one of the vendor's strengths. 
                    Although SAP has high-volume segmentation that leverages  in-memory computing, it has just a handful of references showing  scalability for 50 million customer records or more. Several references mentioned somewhat limited e-mail functionality, but SAP has partnered with others as alternatives. Consider alternatives if SAP is not part of your current or  planned environment. SAP NetWeaver and SAP CRM are required offerings to  use SAP's campaign management capabilities. 
                   SAS continues its leadership positioning in  the MCCM Magic Quadrant for its campaign management wins, with a strong  analytics focus on campaign management. SAS should be on the shortlists  of marketing departments that want advanced analytics within MCCM.                    SAS is a large, privately owned company that reports  approximately $300 million in campaign-management-specific revenue in  2010, up 15% from 2009. The vendor has good basic and advanced functionality for campaign  management, as well as strong advanced analytics capabilities, such as  analytics segmentation and optimization, that are integrated into the  campaign process. Notable changes for SAS since our last MCCM Magic Quadrant  include the purchase of Assetlink. For campaign management, this gives  SAS some presence into the B2B market, as well as improved visibility in  vertical markets such as the pharmaceutical and consumer goods  industries. The SAS road map for 2011 includes the already available (as of  February) SAS Customer Intelligence 5.4 release, which included  improvements to the vendor's dynamic offer arbitration offering in  Real-Time Decision Manager. Customer Intelligence Studio and Campaign  Management enhancements included the visual selection of segments,  cross-campaign prioritization capability and Assetlink integration. References reported that having an integrated data structure  underneath MCCM is one of the most beneficial features of SAS products.  References also mentioned that SAS delivered what was promised "without  storytelling." 
                    References considered SAS for power-user-type work, using SAS'  advanced analytics capability, rather than for its strengths in campaign  management alone. The vendor needs to accelerate its digital marketing strategy,  particularly around its Web analytics offerings. In addition, SAS has  been slow to get adoption for its Real-Time Decision Manager (released  in 2007). These should be highly visible core competencies for SAS, and  should be leveraged as key differentiators in the MCCM space. Consider alternatives when marketing analytics is not an organizational priority. 
                   Aprimo Relationship Manager (ARM), formerly  known as Teradata Relationship Manager (TRM), and the Aprimo  acquisition put this vendor in the Leaders quadrant. Companies with  large amounts of data, or with complex datasets for segmentation and B2C  targeting, should consider ARM. Consider Aprimo Campaign Management  when MRM is a strong component for MCCM overall, or when a SaaS offering  for B2B lead management is needed. Consider alternatives when some  digital marketing capabilities (specifically transactional marketing)  aren't a priority.                    Teradata and Aprimo have unified the branding of their campaign  management offerings under the Aprimo brand. Aprimo will continue to  develop, sell and support the existing offerings separately, depending  on business issues, data strategy, deployment preference and complexity  of campaigns. Teradata will now own leading MRM capability, instead of  partnering for it. Aprimo will gain a bigger R&D budget, including  more developers. Aprimo will have an expanded global sales team motivated to sell  MCCM. Led by Aprimo executives, the company can better target CMOs with  focused business applications, selling to marketing in addition to the  IT buyer. Aprimo's expanded offerings will give Teradata an  easier-to-use campaign management offering. The road map for 2011 includes full integration among Aprimo  Marketing Studio (AMS), Marketing Resource Management and ARM, as well  as between Aprimo's full-service e-mail offering and ARM. References consistently mentioned MRM as a strength for Aprimo,  and noted Teradata's capacity to respond to customer support needs as a  strength. 
                    Teradata-Aprimo expects a complete combined offering "at least  three years down the road." References consistently mentioned usability  as the biggest caution for TRM, which the vendor hopes to address with  2011 releases of ARM that incorporate a more intuitive UI. The vendor should continue to improve its MSP partnerships. Teradata-Aprimo should own inbound offer capability, rather than partnering for it. 
                     © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or  its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark  of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. This publication may not be  reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner's prior written  permission. The information contained in this publication has been  obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all  warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such  information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions or  inadequacies in such information. This publication consists of the  opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed  as statements of fact. The opinions expressed herein are subject to  change without notice. Although Gartner research may include a  discussion of related legal issues, Gartner does not provide legal  advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as  such. Gartner is a public company, and its shareholders may include  firms and funds that have financial interests in entities covered in  Gartner research. Gartner's Board of Directors may include senior  managers of these firms or funds. Gartner research is produced  independently by its research organization without input or influence  from these firms, funds or their managers. For further information on  the independence and integrity of Gartner research, see "Guiding  Principles on Independence and Objectivity" on its website, http://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsp.            |   
  |              http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/unica/vol6/article3and4/article3and4.html
  |  
  |                            
  |           We review and adjust our inclusion  criteria for Magic Quadrants and MarketScopes as markets change. As a  result of these adjustments, the mix of vendors in any Magic Quadrant or  MarketScope may change over time. A vendor appearing in a Magic  Quadrant or MarketScope one year and not the next does not necessarily  indicate that we have changed our opinion of that vendor. This may be a  reflection of a change in the market and, therefore, changed evaluation  criteria, or a change of focus by a vendor.       |   
  |                           
  |                      
  |     |    |   
  |                    
  |               
  |             Ability to Execute   Product/Service: Core goods  and services offered by the vendor that compete in/serve the defined  market. This includes current product/service capabilities, quality,  feature sets, skills, etc., whether offered natively or through OEM  agreements/partnerships as defined in the market definition and detailed  in the subcriteria.    Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy, Organization): Viability  includes an assessment of the overall organization's financial health,  the financial and practical success of the business unit, and the  likelihood of the individual business unit to continue investing in the  product, to continue offering the product and to advance the state of  the art within the organization's portfolio of products.    Sales Execution/Pricing: The  vendor's capabilities in all pre-sales activities and the structure that  supports them. This includes deal management, pricing and negotiation,  pre-sales support and the overall effectiveness of the sales channel.    Market Responsiveness and Track Record: Ability  to respond, change direction, be flexible and achieve competitive  success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs evolve  and market dynamics change. This criterion also considers the vendor's  history of responsiveness.    Marketing Execution: The  clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to  deliver the organization's message in order to influence the market,  promote the brand and business, increase awareness of the products, and  establish a positive identification with the product/brand and  organization in the minds of buyers. This "mind share" can be driven by a  combination of publicity, promotional, thought leadership,  word-of-mouth and sales activities.    Customer Experience: Relationships,  products and services/programs that enable clients to be successful  with the products evaluated. Specifically, this includes the ways  customers receive technical support or account support. This can also  include ancillary tools, customer support programs (and the quality  thereof), availability of user groups, service-level agreements, etc.    Operations: The ability of  the organization to meet its goals and commitments. Factors include the  quality of the organizational structure including skills, experiences,  programs, systems and other vehicles that enable the organization to  operate effectively and efficiently on an ongoing basis.      Completeness of Vision   Market Understanding: Ability  of the vendor to understand buyers' wants and needs and to translate  those into products and services. Vendors that show the highest degree  of vision listen and understand buyers' wants and needs, and can shape  or enhance those with their added vision.    Marketing Strategy: A clear,  differentiated set of messages consistently communicated throughout the  organization and externalized through the website, advertising, customer  programs and positioning statements.    Sales Strategy: The strategy  for selling product that uses the appropriate network of direct and  indirect sales, marketing, service and communication affiliates that  extend the scope and depth of market reach, skills, expertise,  technologies, services and the customer base.    Offering (Product) Strategy: The  vendor's approach to product development and delivery that emphasizes  differentiation, functionality, methodology and feature set as they map  to current and future requirements.    Business Model: The soundness and logic of the vendor's underlying business proposition.    Vertical/Industry Strategy: The  vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the  specific needs of individual market segments, including verticals.    Innovation: Direct, related,  complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or capital  for investment, consolidation, defensive or pre-emptive purposes.    Geographic Strategy: The  vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the  specific needs of geographies outside the "home" or native geography,  either directly or through partners, channels and subsidiaries as  appropriate for that geography  |    | 
Aprimo Overview - http://www.21cssindia.com/courses/aprimo-mrm-online-training-241.html
RépondreSupprimerAprimo MRM Business Overview - Functional and System Aprimo Overview - Home Page - System Navigation - Personalization - Other Details - System Configuration Setup - System Administration - Aprimo Tools - Aprimo Security Configuration - User - Groups g - Website Development Company, Website Designing Company, IT Support, ONLINE TRAINING, SEO Services, Call Us +919000444287 Courses at 21st Century Software Solutions
: